![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjM-JDqBOHQZLpDMexn30mjX9vbj_-VHQzBqkoykrm5ZD1M5yJzrlr2Me5BfuQT5g9amZJZ3Ai4mCPjBmDjlUH0xEM6ZFh-m5lSqTzWcFYJHEorjPAUNO7lVBUJ-thoayHh8VhhuIi7kaRJ/s200/angry+picture.jpg)
Something I’ve noticed on LinkedIn (or any on-line article
that solicits feedback) is that people can be downright mean and argumentative
in their responses. Someone might ask a
perfectly innocent question about something and various members within a group will
go off on a mean spirited tyrant about the way the question was worded or the
responses of the other people.
As I skimmed the comments in a professional
resume writers group this morning, I noticed a poll requesting feedback about
the best type of resume format; chronological, functional or both. Good, I thought; this should be interesting
for me to read and share. As I went down
the row of comments though, I noticed that some of the comments were
mean-spirited and pompous. It was uncomfortable and most of the people who were
saying great things stopped commenting. I suppose that the person doing the ranting considers themselves an expert and that the opinions of the others in the group are meaningless.
There’s no need for this and people seem to forget that
recruiters and potential clients may be able to see many of the comments or
questions. Personally, a know-it-all resume writer would turn me off and I’d go
looking for someone with a better personality.